Thursday, 23 November 2006

Segregating Children From Men

3 comments:

  1. Sitting a child next to a man may involve some level of risk of harm.

    Flying also involves risk of harm. We need to look also at the consequences if the harm actually comes about.

    If BA applied the sames rules in each case and decide to segregate children from men isn't it a bit ironic that they are actually flying planes. In their line of business you wouldn't expect them to be so risk averse.

    I would have thought that a paedophile would need to be a bit desperate to risk doing anything indecent to a child in these circumstances.

    Good story though as I wouldn't have believed it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It happened to me (unwittingly) a few years back on a BA flight from Glasgow to London when I asked to change seats with my (female) colleague. I wasn't told why and didn't ask - I just did it - but looking back there was a young girl (about 10) in the window seat. If I had realised why I was being asked to move, I would have been very unhappy.

    Good point about BA's inconsistent approach to risk. I would imagine the chances of a child being sexually molested on a plane by a paedophile is significantly less than being involved in an air accident.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am surprised that you have not been aware of the problem.

    Have you never heard of the expression "flying by the seat of your pants"?

    ReplyDelete